Poster with mini oral Clinical Oncology Society of Australia 2014 Annual Scientific Meeting

An audit and evaluation of the lung cancer journey: metropolitan and non-metropolitan (#359)

Barbara Page 1 2 3 , Phoebe Shields 1 , Alison Hanks 4 , Henry Marshall 1 3 , Rayleen Bowman 1 3 , Ian Yang 1 3 , Kwun Fong 1 3
  1. Department of Thoracic Medicine, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia
  2. Central Integrated Regional Cancer Service, Department of Health, Bowen Hills, Queensland, Australia
  3. Northside School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
  4. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St Lucia , Queensland, Australia

Studies have shown that remoteness of residence is associated with an increase of lung cancer incidence and mortality.1 The Department of Thoracic Medicine at The Prince Charles Hospital (TPCH) in partnership with Central Integrated Regional Cancer Services, Queensland is exploring whether differences exist in the lung cancer pathway for patients living within 50 km of TPCH (metropolitan)  to those living more than 50km from TPCH (non-metropolitan).

We described and compared the time from referral to diagnosis and up to commencement of treatment for metropolitan and non –metropolitan patients with suspected lung cancer referred to TPCH from December 2010 to 31 May 2013. Data was obtained from various Queensland Health patient information systems.

562 patient records were reviewed and categorised according to distance from TPCH (metropolitan patients N= 345 and non-metropolitan patients N=217).  51% of metropolitan patients (N=204) and 52% of non-metropolitan patients (N=106) commenced definitive treatment (surgery, chemoradiation or radiation alone) within 62 days from receipt of referral (UK NHS benchmark 62 days).  The most significant difference was time to chemoradiation or radiation where metropolitan patients waited 26 days longer.

Findings from this retrospective audit and evaluation study suggest that non-metropolitan patients are not placed at any significant disadvantage than their metropolitan counterparts in this service delivery model. The reasons why metropolitan patients in this study had a longer wait for chemoradiation or radiation is being explored.  

The authors acknowledge Central Integrated Regional Cancer Service’s support in undertaking this study.

  1. Queensland Government, Lung cancer in Queensland: an overview 2012. Brisbane Queensland Health 2012.